Democrats Oppose Obama-U.N. Gun Control Treaty

By Paul Bedard

Posted: July 26, 2011

Print

Twelve Democratic senators have joined 45 Republicans in a fast growing movement to halt progress on an Obama-backed United Nations effort that could bring international gun control into the United States and slap America's gun owners with severe restrictions.

[Read more about gun rights and gun control.]

Montana Democratic Sen. Jon Tester's office today provided Whispers with their letter, signed by 11 other Democrats, urging the president to press for significant changes in the treaty. Their major concern: that domestic manufacture, possession, and sales of firearms and ammo will be included, thereby giving an international authority the right to regulate arms sales already protected by the Second Amendment. They also said any move for an international gun registry would be a non-starter. [See editorial cartoons about the Democrats.]

A Republican letter circulated by Kansas Republican Sen. Jerry Moran has 45 signatures.

Ratification requires two-thirds of the Senate. So far 57 senators have said they would vote against the treaty, expected to be wrapped up next year.

In his letter, Moran wrote, "Our country's sovereignty and the Second Amendment rights of American citizens must not be infringed upon by the United Nations," Moran wrote in the letter. "Today, the Senate sends a powerful message to the Obama Administration: an Arms Trade Treaty that does not protect ownership of civilian firearms will fail in the Senate. Our firearm freedoms are not negotiable."

The emergence of strong Democratic resistance comes as the president is trying to deal with fallout from liberal Democrats upset that he has opened the door to major changes in Social Security and Medicare as part of the debt ceiling crisis. [Check out political cartoons about the budget and deficit.]

The U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, which the Bush administration had opposed, would regulate with the international trade of arms. It would cover the trading of conventional firearms likes those used by collectors and sportsmen and women. [Read NRA Boss: Obama's Gone in 2012.]

The goal of the treaty is to come up with internationally recognized rules governing the trade of guns and ammo. The United States is the world's largest exporter of arms.

Tester's letter concludes, "As members of the United States Senate, it is our constitutional responsibility to advise and consent on the ratification of the United Nation's Arms Trade Treaty. Before we could support ratification, we must have assurances that our concerns are adequately addressed and that the Treaty will not in any way impede upon the Constitutional rights of American gun owners. Anything short of this commitment would be unacceptable.

DanR

Everybody here is defending gun safety, etc. We do not have to. We have a constitutional right to keep and bear arms. We do not have to explain ourselves and why we deserve this right any more than we have to justify any other rights we have in the USA. These leftys who want to tell everyone what to do should be absolutely ignored. They are just a bunch of whining know-it-alls.

Dan of FL @ Aug 14, 2011 13:29:21 PM

The recent riots in the UK are a shining example of how "civilized" a disarmed populace can be.

patriot2nd of @ Aug 14, 2011 01:48:08 AM

Gun owners are safe

Again the anti-gun crowd spews half truths and fairy tales of utopia.

BATF in 1998 estimated there were in excess of 223,000,000 firearms in the United States (number of firarms is considerably more now). According to the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, there were 9,484 firearms used to kill someone in 2008. That works out to 0.00425%.

That means 99.99575% of all guns were NOT used in a homicide, yet there are plenty of people out there who would punish this group for the acts of others. Why? Gold bullion held in US government vaults has a purity level of 99.99%, which means American gun owner responsibility is at a higher standard than our country's gold reserve!!!

If you don't care to own or purchase a firearm, that is YOUR business not mine. Yet these same people demand that their choice be mine. Outrageous. In what other scenerio would the behavior of less than half of a hundredth of a percentage point outway the actions of the rest? No where.

I can quote statistics on how safe guns and gunowners are until the cows come home, but reason does not play into the equation when people scream for the banning of all firearms. So I offer this challenge to ALL anti-gun people; place a 8.5"x11" sign in your front window declaring that your home is gun free. Not one of you will do so, and here is why - you are willing to hide behind the shield that your gun owning neighbors provide. There is NO other reason for not putting up such a sign. Me? I have no problem asking a crook if they can run faster than 1200 feet per second. If not, it will suck to be them because I hit what I aim at.

In the NRA publication "American Rifleman" they have an entire page dedicated to stories where gun carrying people stopped a crime or a criminal with a firearm. Never seen a story where an anti-gun person stopped a crime or criminal by virtue of not having a firearm.

sgtrock of AZ @ Aug 08, 2011 21:01:10 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You
Please enter the two words below into the text field underneath the image.
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Twitter

Bobbles Poll

Bobbles Poll: Recall Congress?

Some want Speaker John Boehner, President Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to call Congress back from recess to deal with the nation's debt downgrading and cut more spending. Should Congress be recalled?

View Results

Twitter and Facebook

Whispers on the Web

Friend Paul on Facebook.

Follow Paul on Twitter.

Latest Video