This page provides a list of scientific venues (conference, journals, and some notable workshops) which indicates if they are open-access or closed-access. It focuses on international venues relevant to data management researchers (either in this core area, or in another connected area where data management researchers frequently publish), peer-reviewed by experts in the field, and reputable in their area.
Feel free to contact me if you would like me to include some relevant conference or journal that is currently not listed, or if you have corrections to make to some entries. Note that the reputability criterion is somewhat subjective, and I will make the decision as to whether a venue satisfies this condition.
Coverage of areas that are non-core data management research is not expected to be comprehensive; coverage of workshops cannot be complete either, due to the large number of existing workshops.
We consider the following questions to determine how open a venue is:
If content is freely accessible, APCs are non-existent or low, and no exclusive publishing rights are granted or the content is licensed by the publisher under a free, permissive, license (such as Creative Commons BY-SA or less restrictive), we classify the venue as open-access, in green in the table below. If content is freely accessible but other conditions are not satisfied, the venue appears in yellow; otherwise, in red. In addition, we also provide information on the license used for publishing content.
Note that many publishers offer the authors a choice between a closed-access model and paying a large sum (of the order of 1 000 USD or more) for the article to be freely available. This choice unfortunately makes it impossible to rely on the fact that all content published in a venue will be freely accessible (indeed, such an option is rarely chosen by authors); consequently, readers are forced to keep paying subscription fees for this venue. In addition, the amounts charged are disproportionate to what full open-access publishers charge. For these reasons, we do not mention this choice in the table below. We provide further down some indications on current article processing charges for different publishers.
This page deliberately avoids the traditional colour-based open-access terminology. In this terminology, “gold” open access means that the version of record is freely available from the publisher; “green” open access means that authors may deposit some version of the article (often a preprint or the accepted manuscript) in a repository or on their Web page, while the version of record remains behind a paywall; “diamond” (or “platinum”) open access is gold open access with no author-facing charges; “hybrid” refers to subscription venues in which individual articles can be made freely available for a fee, as discussed above.
Beyond the fact that they are not always used consistently, these terms have been co-opted by traditional publishers: “gold” open access is now commonly equated with charging authors large article processing charges, as if this were the only sustainable model; venues are advertised as “green” open access even though the publisher requires exclusive rights and imposes embargoes or restrictions on which version can be shared, so that the scientific record itself remains paywalled; “hybrid” venues let publishers collect both APCs and subscription fees. More fundamentally, this terminology emphasizes where and by whom a version of an article can be read, and obscures what actually matters: whether access to published articles is restricted, whether exclusive rights are required by the publisher, and whether charges to authors are commensurate with actual publication costs; these are the three criteria used on this page, as explained above.
Article processing charges are only deemed excessive (“yes” in the “Excessive APCs” column of the table below) when they are neither non-existent, low, nor included in the conference registration fee; this is currently the case for ACM venues, see the APC section at the bottom of this page.
| Area | Venue | Type | Publisher | Access restricted | Exclusive rights required | Excessive APCs | License |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 - DB Systems | EDBT | Conf. | OpenProceedings | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 01 - DB Systems | PVLDB | Mixed | VLDB Endowment | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 04 - Web and IR | WWW | Conf. | ACM (since 2023; IW3C2 before) | no | no | yes | or ![]() |
| 06 - CS Theory | STOC | Conf. | ACM | no | no | yes | or ![]() |
| 06 - CS Theory | ITCS | Conf. | Schloss Dagstuhl | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 01 - DB Systems | SIGMOD | Conf. | ACM | no | no | yes | or ![]() |
| 02 - DB Systems & Theory | AMW | Workshop | CEUR-WS.org | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 08 - Data Mining | KDD | Conf. | ACM | no | no | yes | or ![]() |
| 06 - CS Theory | SODA | Conf. | SIAM | in principle | yes | no | SIAM Copyright Policy |
| 06 - CS Theory | LICS | Conf. | Schloss Dagstuhl (since 2026; ACM/IEEE before) | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 04 - Web and IR | SIGIR | Conf. | ACM | no | no | yes | or ![]() |
| 04 - Web and IR | WSDM | Conf. | ACM | no | no | yes | or ![]() |
| 06 - CS Theory | TheoretiCS | Journal | Episciences.org | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 06 - CS Theory | JACM | Journal | ACM | no | no | yes | or ![]() |
| 02 - DB Systems & Theory | TODS | Journal | ACM | no | no | yes | or ![]() |
| 01 - DB Systems | SIGSPATIAL | Conf. | ACM | no | no | yes | or ![]() |
| 03 - DB Theory | PODS | Conf. | ACM | no | no | yes | or ![]() |
| 01 - DB Systems | CIKM | Conf. | ACM | no | no | yes | or ![]() |
| 03 - DB Theory | ICDT | Conf. | Schloss Dagstuhl | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 03 - DB Theory | TIME | Conf. | Schloss Dagstuhl | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 06 - CS Theory | FOCS | Conf. | IEEE | yes | yes | no | IEEE Copyright Policy |
| 01 - DB Systems | ICDE | Conf. | IEEE | yes | yes | no | IEEE Copyright Policy |
| 06 - CS Theory | LMCS | Journal | Episciences.org | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 06 - CS Theory | DMTCS | Journal | Episciences.org | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 06 - CS Theory | ToC | Journal | ToC | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 06 - CS Theory | CJTCS | Journal | U. Chicago | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 06 - CS Theory | ICALP | Conf. | Schloss Dagstuhl | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 06 - CS Theory | STACS | Conf. | Schloss Dagstuhl | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 06 - CS Theory | CSL | Conf. | Schloss Dagstuhl | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 01 - DB Systems | TKDE | Journal | IEEE | yes | yes | no | IEEE Copyright Policy |
| 07 - AI | SAT | Conf. | Schloss Dagstuhl | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 07 - AI | ESWC | Conf. | Springer | yes | yes | no | Springer Copyright Policy |
| 07 - AI | ISWC | Conf. | Springer | yes | yes | no | Springer Copyright Policy |
| 02 - DB Systems & Theory | VLDB Journal | Journal | Springer | yes | yes | no | Springer Copyright Policy |
| 01 - DB Systems | DaPD | Journal | Springer | yes | yes | no | Springer Copyright Policy |
| 01 - DB Systems | TLDKS | Journal | Springer | yes | yes | no | Springer Copyright Policy |
| 01 - DB Systems | DKE | Journal | Elsevier | yes | yes | no | Elsevier Copyright Policy |
| 01 - DB Systems | Inf. Syst. | Journal | Elsevier | yes | yes | no | Elsevier Copyright Policy |
| 05 - General CS | Inf. Process. Lett. | Journal | Elsevier | yes | yes | no | Elsevier Copyright Policy |
| 05 - General CS | JCSS | Journal | Elsevier | yes | yes | no | Elsevier Copyright Policy |
| 06 - CS Theory | TCS | Journal | Elsevier | yes | yes | no | Elsevier Copyright Policy |
| 01 - DB Systems | CIDR | Conf. | CIDR | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 06 - CS Theory | ToCS | Journal | Springer | yes | yes | no | Springer Copyright Policy |
| 07 - AI | JAIR | Journal | AI Access Foundation | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 07 - AI | IJCAI | Conf. | IJCAI | no | yes | no | IJCAI Copyright Policy |
| 07 - AI | AIJ | Journal | Elsevier | yes | yes | no | Elsevier Copyright Policy |
| 07 - AI | AAAI | Conf. | AAAI | no | yes | no | AAAI Copyright Policy |
| 07 - AI | KR | Conf. | IJCAI Organization | no | yes | no | IJCAI Copyright Policy |
| 01 - DB Systems | DEXA | Conf. | Springer | yes | yes | no | Springer Copyright Policy |
| 01 - DB Systems | DASFAA | Conf. | Springer | yes | yes | no | Springer Copyright Policy |
| 08 - Data Mining | PKDD | Conf. | Springer | yes | yes | no | Springer Copyright Policy |
| 09 - Machine Learning | ECML | Conf. | Springer | yes | yes | no | Springer Copyright Policy |
| 09 - Machine Learning | NeurIPS | Conf. | NeurIPS Foundation | no | no | no | unspecified |
| 09 - Machine Learning | ICML | Conf. | PMLR | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 09 - Machine Learning | COLT | Conf. | PMLR | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 09 - Machine Learning | JMLR | Journal | JMLR | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 06 - CS Theory | MFCS | Conf. | Schloss Dagstuhl | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 06 - CS Theory | FoSSaCS | Conf. | Springer | no | no | no | (since 2026) |
| 10 - Prog. Languages | ESOP | Conf. | Springer | no | no | no | (since 2026) |
| 10 - Prog. Languages | POPL | Conf. | ACM | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 10 - Prog. Languages | ICFP | Conf. | ACM | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 10 - Prog. Languages | PLDI | Conf. | ACM | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 06 - CS Theory | FSCD | Conf. | Schloss Dagstuhl | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 06 - CS Theory | TOCL | Journal | ACM | no | no | yes | or ![]() |
| 06 - CS Theory | SIAM J. Comput. | Journal | SIAM | yes | yes | no | SIAM Copyright Policy |
| 06 - CS Theory | Fundamenta Informaticae | Journal | Episciences.org and Sage (formerly IOS Press) | no | no | no | CC BY 4.0 or arXiv non-exclusive (per article) |
| 09 - Machine Learning | ICLR | Conf. | ICLR | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 04 - Web and IR | TOIS | Journal | ACM | no | no | yes | or ![]() |
| 08 - Data Mining | TKDD | Journal | ACM | no | no | yes | or ![]() |
| 09 - Machine Learning | TMLR | Journal | JMLR | no | no | no | ![]() |
| 04 - Web and IR | ECIR | Conf. | Springer | yes | yes | no | Springer Copyright Policy |
| 08 - Data Mining | ICDM | Conf. | IEEE | yes | yes | no | IEEE Copyright Policy |
| 08 - Data Mining | SDM | Conf. | SIAM | in principle | yes | no | SIAM Copyright Policy |
The area classification is quite ad hoc, and some venues could also fit in other areas; this is not perfect, but the goal was simply to ease readbility of the table.
Many thanks to Antoine Amarilli for advice in compiling this list and presenting the information therein.
Some publishers require an article processing charge (APC) for each published open-access article, as an alternative to the closed-access model. The author may have a choice between the two models. The cost is sometimes hidden to authors as part of conference registration fees. Here are the current APCs charged by different publishers:
To put these amounts in perspective, it is instructive to estimate the real cost of disseminating and archiving a scientific paper, using arXiv as a reference point. According to its 2025 annual report, arXiv's total expenses for fiscal year 2025 (July 2024–June 2025) amounted to 6.7 million USD, including in-kind contributions from Cornell University and exceptional expenses related to arXiv's migration to the cloud; in calendar year 2025, arXiv received 284 486 new submissions. A back-of-the-envelope computation thus yields a cost of less than 25 USD per new paper; note that this amount covers not only the processing of new submissions (including moderation) but also the long-term archiving and serving of the entire collection of nearly 3 million papers. arXiv does not organize peer review; but neither do traditional publishers pay the scientists who review and, in most cases, edit the articles they publish. Even accounting for costs arXiv does not incur, such as copy-editing or typesetting where they exist, APCs in the thousands of dollars are one to two orders of magnitude above the real cost of publishing and archiving a paper.
Some content on this page has been contributed by: